Drudge Report plays up AP photo of Bush with ‘devil horns’

The Raw Story | Mike Sheehan | Dec 21 2006

Photo  “BUSH ‘DEVIL HORNS’ PIC HITS WIRES…” blared the headline at the right-wing Drudge Report.

The site suggests that an Associated Press photograph of President Bush, credited to Lawrence Jackson, had intentionally been taken at an angle, or otherwise changed or cropped by the news organization, to portray the president in an evil light. Bloggers were quick to put their own spin on the charge by the Drudge Report, which follows several recent press photos that have come under fire for various forms of alteration.

A commenter at Hot Air had this to say of the “horns” shot:

It’s not the photographer. Lawrence Jackson is a good photographer with no history of this type of thing, but the cropping is obvious. Why would you crop a photo almost to his chin, and then so high above his head unless you were purposely attempting to frame in the “horns?”

It is unknown at the present time if the AP has issued a public comment about what, if anything, was done to the picture of the president.

This latest alleged “photo manipulation” compares with a slew of press photos taken earlier in Bush’s tenure that made him appear remarkably “holier”–such as this 2003 AP photo by Charles Dharapak, in which the president’s head seems to be surrounded by a spectral halo. The “halo” is in fact a presidential seal mounted on the wall behind him, faded out in the distance–not unlike the somewhat clearer seal in the Drudge-hyped picture.

The Drudge Report has since taken the “devil horns” headline off the page, but it remains in their archives.


One Response to “Drudge Report plays up AP photo of Bush with ‘devil horns’”

  1. maybe only a few of us can see the halo around the horns in this newer photo, too, angelic in its very essence, since the seal looks the way the seal looks, even when we’ve put some man’s or some monkey’s head in front of it. not that anyone would ever put a monkey’s head in front of our presidential seal, but i personally have no problem with it. this is supposedly a free country, or something like that, and we only try to “promote” good behavior around the globe, with the guidance of someone or other. we should be allowed to interpret images for ourselves, in theory at least. as i understand it, our president has a theory about winning a war. theories will save us, then, if anything does, by god! i really don’t like terrorist very much, even ones that can get themselves erected to higher and higher offices in this great land of hours and days and minutes and seconds. time is such a funny animal!

    what’s his name again, king george, of the bush men? something like that, I forget… somehow this all smells like a lot of crop, yes indeed!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: